On 09/08/2017 06:01 AM, Thomas Meyer wrote: > The multiple_kprobes test case fails to check for KPROBE_EVENT support. > Add the check to prevent a false test result. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer <thomas@xxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc > index 2a1cb9908746..a4fd4c851a5b 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc > @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ > #!/bin/sh > # description: Register/unregister many kprobe events > > +[ -f kprobe_events ] || exit_unsupported # this is configurable > + > # ftrace fentry skip size depends on the machine architecture. > # Currently HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE defined on x86 and powerpc64le > case `uname -m` in > Hi Steve/Masami, This patch looks good to me. Adds a check similar to the one one in tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/functions If you don't have objections, I will get this into 4.14-rc2 or rc3 thanks, -- Shuah -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
