Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] kselftest: add TAP13 output format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/15/2017 08:16 AM, Paul Elder wrote:
> On 06/14/2017 04:06 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 06/12/2017 12:56 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> Second try at adding TAP 13 output format to the kselftest core.
>>>
>>> These patches add an initial framework to the kselftest header file to
>>> provide a way for tests to output in TAP13 format, and then goes on to
>>> convert 3 different tests to use the format, showing that it does work
>>> well.
>>>
>>> The TAP13 format specification can be found here:
>>>
>>> Version 2:
>>>   - refactor the function names to drop the _tap suffix - Alice
>>>
>>> Paul Elder (4):
>>>   kselftest: add TAP13 conformant versions of ksft_* functions
>>>   kselftest: membarrier: convert to TAP13 output
>>>   kselftest: breakpoints: convert breakpoint_test to TAP13 output
>>>   kselftest: breakpoints: convert step_after_suspend_test to TAP13
>>>     output
>>>
>>>  .../selftests/breakpoints/breakpoint_test.c        | 29 ++++++------
>>>  .../breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c          | 43 +++++++-----------
>>>  tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h                | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>  .../testing/selftests/membarrier/membarrier_test.c | 35 ++++++++-------
>>>  4 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the series. The output looks good and API is good.
>> I applied the series to linux-kselftest next for 4.13-rc1
> I guess I misunderstood this. I didn't realized you accepted the
> series into your tree. Thank you!
> 
>>
>> I have a few minor comments on
>>
>> [PATCH v2 2/4] kselftest: membarrier: convert to TAP13 output
> It seems like we're still waiting on this. Should I send the
> patch to make ksft_exit_skip() print output as an entirely separate
> patch?
> 

I pulled all 4 patches in. Please see linux-kselftest next latest.
There might a few little issues in breakpoints patches that could
be dine differently, especially including perror() strings, but
I want to get this in and refine later.

Please do this:

- Patch 1: Send a patch to make ksft_exit_skip() print output. This
  will be an incremental change to your v2
- Patch 2: membarrier patch changes as recommended in my review.
  This will be an incremental change to your v2.

Please do these patches on top of linux-kselftest next

thanks,
-- Shuah
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux