On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Kyle Huey <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> In order to introduce new arch_prctls that are not 64 bit only, rename the >> existing 64 bit implementation to do_arch_prctl_64(). Also rename the second >> argument to arch_prctl(), which will no longer always be an address. > >> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 >> void entry_SYSCALL_64(void); >> +long do_arch_prctl_64(struct task_struct *task, int code, unsigned long arg2); >> #endif > > Could you please also rename the weirdly named 'code' argument to 'option', > to be in line with the existing sys_prctl() interface nomenclature? arch_prctl consistently uses 'code' throughout the kernel and in the main page. This renaming should probably be done separately if desired. - Kyle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
