* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > * Kyle Huey <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > In order to introduce new arch_prctls that are not 64 bit only, rename the > > > existing 64 bit implementation to do_arch_prctl_64(). Also rename the second > > > argument to arch_prctl(), which will no longer always be an address. > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > > > void entry_SYSCALL_64(void); > > > +long do_arch_prctl_64(struct task_struct *task, int code, unsigned long arg2); > > > #endif > > > > Could you please also rename the weirdly named 'code' argument to 'option', > > to be in line with the existing sys_prctl() interface nomenclature? > > I'll fix that up when picking up the series. No need for another iteration, ok? I think the main patch needs a bit of conceptual work still: - simpler ABI - better exec() behavior - simpler, better, faster implementation for the MSR writes ... see the mail I just wrote. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
