On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 08:26:09AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 05:59:01PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:46:54 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > > > [PATCH next] ice: Fix signedness bug in ice_init_interrupt_scheme()
> > >
> > > I believe it should be "PATCH net" with
> > >
> > > > If pci_alloc_irq_vectors() can't allocate the minimum number of vectors
> > > > then it returns -ENOSPC so there is no need to check for that in the
> > > > caller. In fact, because pf->msix.min is an unsigned int, it means that
> > > > any negative error codes are type promoted to high positive values and
> > > > treated as success. So here the "return -ENOMEM;" is unreachable code.
> > > > Check for negatives instead.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 79d97b8cf9a8 ("ice: remove splitting MSI-X between features")
> > >
> > > a 'Stable:' tag here.
> >
> > Bug only exists in net-next if it comes from commit under Fixes.
> > So I think the patch is good as is.
>
> I want to resen this. My scripts should have put a net-next in the
> subject and I think that changing:
>
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + return vectors;
>
> actually does fall within the scope of the patch so I want to change
> that as well. There is no point in really breaking that into a separate
> patch from a practical perspective.
Thanks for fixing, I blindly followed scheme from idpf (there is the
same issue). However in ice it was done correctly before my patch.
Reviewed-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
