On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 05:59:01PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:46:54 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > > [PATCH next] ice: Fix signedness bug in ice_init_interrupt_scheme()
> >
> > I believe it should be "PATCH net" with
> >
> > > If pci_alloc_irq_vectors() can't allocate the minimum number of vectors
> > > then it returns -ENOSPC so there is no need to check for that in the
> > > caller. In fact, because pf->msix.min is an unsigned int, it means that
> > > any negative error codes are type promoted to high positive values and
> > > treated as success. So here the "return -ENOMEM;" is unreachable code.
> > > Check for negatives instead.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 79d97b8cf9a8 ("ice: remove splitting MSI-X between features")
> >
> > a 'Stable:' tag here.
>
> Bug only exists in net-next if it comes from commit under Fixes.
> So I think the patch is good as is.
I want to resen this. My scripts should have put a net-next in the
subject and I think that changing:
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return vectors;
actually does fall within the scope of the patch so I want to change
that as well. There is no point in really breaking that into a separate
patch from a practical perspective.
regards,
dan carpenter
