Hi Markus. > * Why did you repeat typos in this patch iteration? > * Would you like to take the relevance of imperative wordings for changelogs better into account? Sorry for my mistake, I've fixed it but, I sent an old one :( Thanks On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 7:38 PM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > When nohz_full CPU stops tick in tick_nohz_irq_exit(), > > It wouldn't be chosen to perform idle load balancing bacause it doesn't > … > > So, nohz_balance_enter_idle() could be called safely without !was_stooped > > check. > > * Why did you repeat typos in this patch iteration? > > * Would you like to take the relevance of imperative wordings for changelogs > better into account? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9-rc7#n94 > > > > --- > > kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 6 ++++-- > > Will further patch version descriptions become helpful behind the marker line? > > Regards, > Markus
