> When nohz_full CPU stops tick in tick_nohz_irq_exit(), > It wouldn't be chosen to perform idle load balancing bacause it doesn't … > So, nohz_balance_enter_idle() could be called safely without !was_stooped > check. * Why did you repeat typos in this patch iteration? * Would you like to take the relevance of imperative wordings for changelogs better into account? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9-rc7#n94 > --- > kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 6 ++++-- Will further patch version descriptions become helpful behind the marker line? Regards, Markus
