On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 02:00:42PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > … > > +++ b/include/linux/cleanup.h > > @@ -4,6 +4,118 @@ > > > > #include <linux/compiler.h> > > > > +/** > > + * DOC: scope-based cleanup helpers > > + * > > + * The "goto error" pattern is notorious for introducing … > > Will any other label become more helpful for this description approach? > > > > + * this tedium and can aid in maintaining FILO (first in last out) > ⬆ > Would an other word be more appropriate here? > Hi, This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time. Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot
