Le 18/03/2024 à 04:21, Ratheesh Kannoth a écrit :
On 2024-03-16 at 15:46:10, Christophe JAILLET (christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
UTILITY_NAME_LENGTH is 16. So better use the former when defining the
'utility_name' array. This makes the intent clearer when it is used around
line 260.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/caif/cfctrl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/caif/cfctrl.c b/net/caif/cfctrl.c
index 8480684f2762..b6d9462f92b9 100644
--- a/net/caif/cfctrl.c
+++ b/net/caif/cfctrl.c
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ int cfctrl_linkup_request(struct cflayer *layer,
u8 tmp8;
struct cfctrl_request_info *req;
int ret;
- char utility_name[16];
+ char utility_name[UTILITY_NAME_LENGTH];
Reverse xmas tree.
Hi,
I'll update and repost when net-next is reopened, but honestly, looking
at this file, changing this to reverse xmas style won't change that much
for the overall coding style!
Moreover, as said by Dan, it is not really easy to understand the wishes
of different maintainers. Should I have updated the lay-out, someone
could have argued that patches should be 1 thing at a time.
CJ
struct cfpkt *pkt;
struct cflayer *dn = cfctrl->serv.layer.dn;
--
2.44.0
