Re: [PATCH 0/2] net/smc: Adjustments for two function implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 04:13:09PM +0800, Wen Gu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/12/31 22:55, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 15:48:45 +0100
> > 
> > A few update suggestions were taken into account
> > from static source code analysis.
> > 
> > Markus Elfring (2):
> >    Return directly after a failed kzalloc() in smc_fill_gid_list()
> >    Improve exception handling in smc_llc_cli_add_link_invite()
> > 
> >   net/smc/af_smc.c  |  2 +-
> >   net/smc/smc_llc.c | 15 +++++++--------
> >   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> 
> Hi Markus. I see you want to fix the kfree(NULL) issues in these two patches.
> 
> But I am wondering if this is necessary, since kfree() can handle NULL correctly.

I think the key point is that there are no necessary to call kfree() if
we can avoid this in normal logic.

Tony Lu




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux