On 2023/12/31 22:55, Markus Elfring wrote:
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 15:48:45 +0100 A few update suggestions were taken into account from static source code analysis. Markus Elfring (2): Return directly after a failed kzalloc() in smc_fill_gid_list() Improve exception handling in smc_llc_cli_add_link_invite() net/smc/af_smc.c | 2 +- net/smc/smc_llc.c | 15 +++++++-------- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 2.43.0
Hi Markus. I see you want to fix the kfree(NULL) issues in these two patches. But I am wondering if this is necessary, since kfree() can handle NULL correctly. /** * kfree - free previously allocated memory * @object: pointer returned by kmalloc() or kmem_cache_alloc() * * If @object is NULL, no operation is performed. */ void kfree(const void *object) { struct folio *folio; struct slab *slab; struct kmem_cache *s; trace_kfree(_RET_IP_, object); if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(object))) return; folio = virt_to_folio(object); if (unlikely(!folio_test_slab(folio))) { free_large_kmalloc(folio, (void *)object); return; } slab = folio_slab(folio); s = slab->slab_cache; __kmem_cache_free(s, (void *)object, _RET_IP_); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfree); Thanks, Wen Gu