Re: [PATCH next] cgroup/cpuset: Cleanup signedness issue in cpu_exclusive_check()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/27/23 02:58, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
Smatch complains about returning negative error codes from a type
bool function.

kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:705 cpu_exclusive_check() warn:
	signedness bug returning '(-22)'

The code works correctly, but it is confusing.  The current behavior is
that cpu_exclusive_check() returns true if it's *NOT* exclusive.  Rename
it to cpusets_are_exclusive() and reverse the returns so it returns true
if it is exclusive and false if it's not.  Update both callers as well.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202309201706.2LhKdM6o-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
This is based on sattic analysis, only compile tested
---
  kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 14 +++++++-------
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 15f399153a2e..afefddd33c3e 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -719,18 +719,18 @@ static inline struct cpumask *fetch_xcpus(struct cpuset *cs)
  }
/*
- * cpu_exclusive_check() - check if two cpusets are exclusive
+ * cpusets_are_exclusive() - check if two cpusets are exclusive
   *
- * Return 0 if exclusive, -EINVAL if not
+ * Return true if exclusive, false if not
   */
-static inline bool cpu_exclusive_check(struct cpuset *cs1, struct cpuset *cs2)
+static inline bool cpusets_are_exclusive(struct cpuset *cs1, struct cpuset *cs2)
  {
  	struct cpumask *xcpus1 = fetch_xcpus(cs1);
  	struct cpumask *xcpus2 = fetch_xcpus(cs2);
if (cpumask_intersects(xcpus1, xcpus2))
-		return -EINVAL;
-	return 0;
+		return false;
+	return true;
  }
/*
@@ -833,7 +833,7 @@ static int validate_change(struct cpuset *cur, struct cpuset *trial)
  	cpuset_for_each_child(c, css, par) {
  		if ((is_cpu_exclusive(trial) || is_cpu_exclusive(c)) &&
  		    c != cur) {
-			if (cpu_exclusive_check(trial, c))
+			if (!cpusets_are_exclusive(trial, c))
  				goto out;
  		}
  		if ((is_mem_exclusive(trial) || is_mem_exclusive(c)) &&
@@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
  			cpuset_for_each_child(child, css, parent) {
  				if (child == cs)
  					continue;
-				if (cpu_exclusive_check(cs, child)) {
+				if (!cpusets_are_exclusive(cs, child)) {
  					exclusive = false;
  					break;
  				}

Thanks for fixing that.

Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux