Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 07:35 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > ath11k_wmi_fw_stats_num_vdevs() and ath11k_wmi_fw_stats_num_bcn() really >> > look the same as list_count_nodes(), so use the latter instead of hand >> > writing it. >> > >> > The first ones use list_for_each_entry() and the other list_for_each(), but >> > they both count the number of nodes in the list. >> > >> > While at it, also remove to prototypes of non-existent functions. >> > Based on the names and prototypes, it is likely that they should be >> > equivalent to list_count_nodes(). >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > Un-tested >> >> I'll run sanity tests on ath11k patches. I'll also add "Compile tested >> only" to the commit log. >> >> Oh, and ath11k patches go to ath tree, not net-next. > > Just for awareness, there are 2 additional patches apparently targeting > net-next but being instead for the WiFi tree: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/e77ed7f719787cb8836a93b6a6972f4147e40bc6.1682537509.git.christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx/ > https://lore.kernel.org/all/e6ec525c0c5057e97e33a63f8a4aa482e5c2da7f.1682541872.git.christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx/ Thanks, these are on our wireless patchwork so you can drop them on your end: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/e6ec525c0c5057e97e33a63f8a4aa482e5c2da7f.1682541872.git.christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/e77ed7f719787cb8836a93b6a6972f4147e40bc6.1682537509.git.christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx/ -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches