On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 07:35 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > ath11k_wmi_fw_stats_num_vdevs() and ath11k_wmi_fw_stats_num_bcn() really > > look the same as list_count_nodes(), so use the latter instead of hand > > writing it. > > > > The first ones use list_for_each_entry() and the other list_for_each(), but > > they both count the number of nodes in the list. > > > > While at it, also remove to prototypes of non-existent functions. > > Based on the names and prototypes, it is likely that they should be > > equivalent to list_count_nodes(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Un-tested > > I'll run sanity tests on ath11k patches. I'll also add "Compile tested > only" to the commit log. > > Oh, and ath11k patches go to ath tree, not net-next. Just for awareness, there are 2 additional patches apparently targeting net-next but being instead for the WiFi tree: https://lore.kernel.org/all/e77ed7f719787cb8836a93b6a6972f4147e40bc6.1682537509.git.christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/e6ec525c0c5057e97e33a63f8a4aa482e5c2da7f.1682541872.git.christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx/ Cheers, Paolo
