On 05/12, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 10:37:57AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Thank you for the fix. If you don't mind, can I integrate this fix into
> > the original patch which is in -next?
> >
>
> Yeah, that's not a problem. Feel free.
Thank you~
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > On 05/11, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > Return an error code if f2fs_iget() fails. Currently it returns
> > > success.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 3d7ad9c30607 ("f2fs: change the current atomic write way")
> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > fs/f2fs/file.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > > index 79d1a20fbda9..cd768fadfd67 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > > @@ -2047,6 +2047,7 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write(struct file *filp)
> > > pinode = f2fs_iget(inode->i_sb, fi->i_pino);
> > > if (IS_ERR(pinode)) {
> > > f2fs_up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]);
> > > + ret = PTR_ERR(pinode);
> > > goto out;
> > > }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.35.1
