On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 10:37:57AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thank you for the fix. If you don't mind, can I integrate this fix into
> the original patch which is in -next?
>
Yeah, that's not a problem. Feel free.
regards,
dan carpenter
> Thanks,
>
> On 05/11, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Return an error code if f2fs_iget() fails. Currently it returns
> > success.
> >
> > Fixes: 3d7ad9c30607 ("f2fs: change the current atomic write way")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/file.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > index 79d1a20fbda9..cd768fadfd67 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > @@ -2047,6 +2047,7 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write(struct file *filp)
> > pinode = f2fs_iget(inode->i_sb, fi->i_pino);
> > if (IS_ERR(pinode)) {
> > f2fs_up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]);
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(pinode);
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.35.1
