On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 07:42:48PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > one for net (with the first 2 > > patches) and one for net-next (with the cleanup one)? > > I've never worked with net and net-next directly. > If just adding net and net-next after [PATCH] in the subject of the mail, > yes, I can do it if it helps. I have a separate tree that I use for sending net patches. I generally write my patches against linux-next and then postpone sending them until the next day. Then I open my patch in mutt. cd tmp_tree/ ../switch_to_net.sh cat /var/tmp/mutt-speke-1000-511162-9994856746594827871 | patch -p1 --dry-run If that applies then I "net" to the subject. Otherwise I do a `../switch_to_net-next.sh` verify it applies and send that. Once in a while I will have to modify my patches to apply cleanly against the net tree. It's a pain in the butt and I get it wrong disappointingly often. I only do it for networking. Not for linux-wireless. There is another tree where they complain if you don't add a tree to their patches but I forget what it is... (I don't use the process for them, only for networking). regards, dan carpenter
