Le 01/07/2021 à 18:20, Jeroen de Borst a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 10:58 PM Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This serie is part of the effort to axe the wrappers in
include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h
While looking at it, I spotted:
- a resource leak in an error handling path (patch 1)
- an error code that could be propagated. (patch 2)
This patch could be ignored. It's only goal is to be more consistent
with other drivers.
These 2 paches are not related to the 'pci-dma-compat.h' stuff, which can
be found in patch 3.
Christophe JAILLET (3):
gve: Fix an error handling path in 'gve_probe()'
gve: Propagate error codes to caller
gve: Simplify code and axe the use of a deprecated API
Thanks for these patches.
Can split this into 2 patch series;
Sure.
one for net (with the first 2
patches) and one for net-next (with the cleanup one)?
I've never worked with net and net-next directly.
If just adding net and net-next after [PATCH] in the subject of the
mail, yes, I can do it if it helps.
BTW, I gave a look at https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/
The patch 1/3 is marked as failed because "1 blamed authors not CCed:
lrizzo@xxxxxxxxxx; 1 maintainers not CCed: lrizzo@xxxxxxxxxx"
This author/blame was not spotted by get_maintainer.pl. Is it something
I should worry about?
Also the label in the first patch should probably read
'abort_with_gve_init' instead of 'abort_with_vge_init'.
Good catch. Sorry about that.
Jeroen
CJ
