On 21/05/2021 13:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:21:26PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The variable i is being initialized with a value that is never read,
>> it is being updated later on. The assignment is redundant and can be
>> removed.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/char/ttyprintk.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/ttyprintk.c b/drivers/char/ttyprintk.c
>> index 219fa1382396..230b2c9b3e3c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/ttyprintk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/ttyprintk.c
>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static void tpk_flush(void)
>>
>> static int tpk_printk(const unsigned char *buf, int count)
>> {
>> - int i = tpk_curr;
>> + int i;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>> if (tpk_curr >= TPK_STR_SIZE) {
>> --
>> 2.31.1
>>
>
> This is not ok for what is currently in linux-next :(
Hmm, it applies cleanly on today's linux-next, do you mind re-apply it?
>
> greg k-h
>
