On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 3:19 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I think the patch description is clear enough, but it would help to include > a reference to my earlier patch that tried to fix the problem before. I don't Great! I did mention it in the preceding line to the section I replied to, though. It has it in the patch: """ This patch is related to 2faf12c57ef (staging: vt665x: fix alignment constraints, 2021-02-04) The root cause seems to be that _because_ struct ieee80211_cts is marked as __aligned(2), this requires any encapsulating struct to also have an alignment of 2. """ Maybe it needs to be formatted in a different fashion? Should I use a longer (like 11 chars, maybe) ID?
