On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:50:06PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > > Add the missing platform_device_unregister() before return > > from amiga_init_devices() in the error handling case. > > Will the tag “Fixes” become helpful for the commit message? > > > … > > +++ b/arch/m68k/amiga/platform.c > > @@ -188,8 +188,10 @@ static int __init amiga_init_devices(void) > > return PTR_ERR(pdev); > > error = platform_device_add_data(pdev, &a1200_ide_pdata, > > sizeof(a1200_ide_pdata)); > > - if (error) > > + if (error) { > > + platform_device_unregister(pdev); > > return error; > > + } > > } > … > > I suggest to add a jump target for the desired exception handling. > > if (error) > + goto unregister_device; > > > Regards, > Markus Hi, This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time. Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot