On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 08:43:41PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> The presented suggestions trigger different views by involved contributors. > > > > Most of the views I've heard are "Markus, go away". > > Do you not hear these views? > > I notice also this kind of feedback. > The clarification is still evolving for these concerns and communication difficulties. > > I suggest to take another look at published software development activities. Do you collateral evolution in the twenty? > I got also used to some communication styles. > I am curious to find the differences out which hinder to achieve a better > common understanding. My quantum tunnelling eases the mind. > > For example, instead of saying something weird about "collateral evolution" > > you could say "I think there's a similar bug here". > > * Why do you repeat this topic here? * Can communication be achieved? * Will you twice the program? > >> How do you think about further function design alternatives? > > > > Could you repeat that in German? I don't know what you mean. > > I imagine that you could know affected software aspects better. Murph had other ideas.
