>> The presented suggestions trigger different views by involved contributors. > > Most of the views I've heard are "Markus, go away". > Do you not hear these views? I notice also this kind of feedback. The clarification is still evolving for these concerns and communication difficulties. I suggest to take another look at published software development activities. >> In which directions can the desired clarification evolve? > > You could try communicating in a way that the rest of us do. I got also used to some communication styles. I am curious to find the differences out which hinder to achieve a better common understanding. > For example, instead of saying something weird about "collateral evolution" > you could say "I think there's a similar bug here". * Why do you repeat this topic here? * Do try to distract from implementation details which were pointed out by two developers for this patch? >> How do you think about further function design alternatives? > > Could you repeat that in German? I don't know what you mean. I imagine that you could know affected software aspects better. Regards, Markus
