Re: [PATCH] ipmi: bt-bcm: Use platform_get_irq_optional()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> In this function's reference function 'bt_bmc_probe()',

I have got understanding difficulties for this information.
Would you like to refer to the function “bt_bmc_config_irq”?


> there are judgments of print message about 'bt_bmc->irq',

Would an other wording be nicer?


> so use platform_get_irq_optional() instead of platform_get_irq()
> to avoid redundant dev_err() message.

Will a separate sentence be helpful?

How do you think about another bit of fine-tuning for the commit message?

Regards,
Markus




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux