On 15/01/2020 12:42, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 07:25:07AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> It's probably complaining that cp.name[] isn't initialized. > > That is possible. > >> UBSan will probably generate a warning at runtime when we do: >> >> *ret = cp; >> >> But otherwise it's harmless. > > Yes, because we don't do anything with cpio_data.name. > Yep, apologies for the noise generated by this patch, please ignore it. Colin
