On Fri, 10 Jan 2020, Markus Elfring wrote: > > +@initialize:python@ > … > > +def construct_warnings(str, suggested_fun): > > This function will be used only for the operation modes “org” and “report”. > Thus I suggest to replace the specification “initialize” by a corresponding dependency > which is already applied for the SmPL rule “r”. > > > Can subsequent SmPL disjunctions become more succinct? > > > The passing of function name variants contains a bit of duplicate Python code. > Will a feature request like “Support for SmPL rule groups” become more interesting > for the shown use case? > https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/164 The code is fine as it is in these respects. julia
