> +@initialize:python@ … > +def construct_warnings(str, suggested_fun): This function will be used only for the operation modes “org” and “report”. Thus I suggest to replace the specification “initialize” by a corresponding dependency which is already applied for the SmPL rule “r”. Can subsequent SmPL disjunctions become more succinct? The passing of function name variants contains a bit of duplicate Python code. Will a feature request like “Support for SmPL rule groups” become more interesting for the shown use case? https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/164 Regards, Markus
