On 10/31/19 4:55 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > The problem is that this enum is unsigned, and we do use "ret" for the > enum values, but we also use it for negative error codes. If it's not > signed then it causes a problem in the error handling. I noticed this one the other day, merged in a fix for it then. Not an issue in the current tree, though linux-next may still have the older one. -- Jens Axboe
