> I think part of the issue is that the script reports a WARNING How much does this information influence really the stress tolerance and change resistance (or acceptance) for the presented collateral evolution? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/scripts/coccinelle/api/devm_platform_ioremap_resource.cocci > for something that is definitely correct code, Can related software improvement possibilities be taken into account again under other circumstances? > and could instead be simply toned down. Does this view mean that the mentioned script for the semantic patch language should get another chance for integration? > Anyway, FWIW: > > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> Would you like to share any more constructive feedback? Will similar source file mass updates be better picked up by other well-known Linux developers? Regards, Markus
