> While it is useful for new drivers to use devm_platform_ioremap_resource, This is nice. > this script is currently used to spam maintainers, This view is unfortunate. Do we stumble on a target conflict again? > often updating very old drivers. This can also happen. > The net benefit is the removal of 2 lines of code in the driver Additional effects can be reconsidered, can't they? > but the review load for the maintainers is huge. Does collateral evolution trigger a remarkable amount of changes occasionally? How will such feedback influence the development and integration of further scripts for the semantic patch language (Coccinelle software)? Regards, Markus
