merged into cifs-2.6.git for-next On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 1:10 PM Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Trivial fix to a spelling mistake of the error access name EACCESS, > rename to EACCES > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/cifs/file.c | 2 +- > fs/cifs/inode.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c > index 84477e995246..6894d071850a 100644 > --- a/fs/cifs/file.c > +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c > @@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@ cifs_lock_add(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock) > * Set the byte-range lock (mandatory style). Returns: > * 1) 0, if we set the lock and don't need to request to the server; > * 2) 1, if no locks prevent us but we need to request to the server; > - * 3) -EACCESS, if there is a lock that prevents us and wait is false. > + * 3) -EACCES, if there is a lock that prevents us and wait is false. > */ > static int > cifs_lock_add_if(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock, > diff --git a/fs/cifs/inode.c b/fs/cifs/inode.c > index 0945d40030eb..3685e2c25205 100644 > --- a/fs/cifs/inode.c > +++ b/fs/cifs/inode.c > @@ -1305,8 +1305,8 @@ cifs_drop_nlink(struct inode *inode) > /* > * If d_inode(dentry) is null (usually meaning the cached dentry > * is a negative dentry) then we would attempt a standard SMB delete, but > - * if that fails we can not attempt the fall back mechanisms on EACCESS > - * but will return the EACCESS to the caller. Note that the VFS does not call > + * if that fails we can not attempt the fall back mechanisms on EACCES > + * but will return the EACCES to the caller. Note that the VFS does not call > * unlink on negative dentries currently. > */ > int cifs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry) > -- > 2.19.1 > -- Thanks, Steve
