From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Trivial fix to a spelling mistake of the error access name EACCESS, rename to EACCES Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/cifs/file.c | 2 +- fs/cifs/inode.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c index 84477e995246..6894d071850a 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/file.c +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c @@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@ cifs_lock_add(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock) * Set the byte-range lock (mandatory style). Returns: * 1) 0, if we set the lock and don't need to request to the server; * 2) 1, if no locks prevent us but we need to request to the server; - * 3) -EACCESS, if there is a lock that prevents us and wait is false. + * 3) -EACCES, if there is a lock that prevents us and wait is false. */ static int cifs_lock_add_if(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock, diff --git a/fs/cifs/inode.c b/fs/cifs/inode.c index 0945d40030eb..3685e2c25205 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/inode.c +++ b/fs/cifs/inode.c @@ -1305,8 +1305,8 @@ cifs_drop_nlink(struct inode *inode) /* * If d_inode(dentry) is null (usually meaning the cached dentry * is a negative dentry) then we would attempt a standard SMB delete, but - * if that fails we can not attempt the fall back mechanisms on EACCESS - * but will return the EACCESS to the caller. Note that the VFS does not call + * if that fails we can not attempt the fall back mechanisms on EACCES + * but will return the EACCES to the caller. Note that the VFS does not call * unlink on negative dentries currently. */ int cifs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry) -- 2.19.1
