> You're 1/8 patch had an actual bug fix hidden amongst the style churn. It showed the general possibility to adjust the source code structure for the function “chap_server_compute_md5” also because of the usage of the single jump label “out” before. > I don't see any such fixes in the other patches. This view is appropriate. Further update steps show different transformation possibilities. > My opinion from https://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg16342.html > hasn't changed. FWIW, I'd prefer to see LIO adopt a policy similar to: > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Developer%27s_FAQ#How_not_to_start It seems that you express a few aspects for general change resistance. Will the circumstances evolve for similar software improvements? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
