Re: omapfb/dss: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in three functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> How many times have I told you to include the reason for
> your patches in your proposed commit message?

It might be useful to look again.


> Too often.

I answered this feedback to some degree.


> Many people do not know that a generic kmalloc does a
> dump_stack() on OOM.

This is another interesting information, isn't it?

It is expected that the function “devm_kzalloc” has got a similar property.


> That information should be part of the commit message.

How do you think about to provide it also in any reference documentation
in a clearer way?

I would be more confident then to copy it into my messages.
Do you want that I take your current answer as an official note
for my work (instead of waiting for adjustments of other areas)?


> Also removing the printk code reduces overall code size.

Such an effect can be nice if the involved contributors can agree on
the deletion of questionable error messages at all.


> The actual size reduction should be described in the
> commit message too.

For which hardware and software combinations would you like to see
facts there?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux