> There is the generic stack dump on OOM so the module/line > is already known. Can such an implementation detail become better documented than in C source code? > The existence of these messages increases code size which > also make the OOM condition slightly more likely. Interesting view … > Markus' commit messages are always really poor descriptions > of why these removals are somewhat useful and the commit > could/should/might be applied. I agree that they could be improved for this transformation pattern if other information sources would become clearer for corresponding references. It seems that I got no responses so far for clarification requests according to the documentation in a direction I hoped for. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
