>>>> It seems that I got no responses so far for clarification requests >>>> according to the documentation in a direction I hoped for. >>> >>> That's because you are pretty unresponsive to direction. >> >> From which places did you get this impression? > > Perhaps from the text that you have written only four lines below. > All comments are dismissed as "the usual mixture of disagreements and acceptance". A mixture will always evolve. * Some acceptance might not need further considerations. * But the disagreements are remembered differently. They have got a potential for further improvements in some areas. > If you look at the patches sent by others, who learn from > the feedback provided to them, I am also learning to some degree continuously. > there are not so many responses on the disagreements side. How do you think about to look at the details for such an observation? > So the mixture is not usual. I find that it can be also a matter of statistics. > Since you send lots of patches on the same issues, Yes. - I am trying to fix some implementation details by the means of source code analysis and corresponding transformation. The patch count is still growing. > there should be no disagreements at all at this point. I got an other impression. The probability for disagreements is increasing in relation to the number of contributors to which I show change possibilities. There are also other open issues remaining which can get another solution somehow. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
