On 26/11/17 11:34 PM, Julia Lawall wrote: > It would probably be better not to mention the KERN_CONT possibility at > all. Oh? I don't disagree... but what are we supposed to do in these cases? The way v2 of my patch works it just says that there is a missing new line. But Joe calls that a false positive. So if we can't report that it's missing a new line and we can't say it looks like it needs a KERN_CONT, then what can we do? The case is obviously wrong in some way or another so we probably shouldn't just ignore it. Logan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
