On 26/11/17 10:09 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: > I don't know. In any case, a Coccinelle script would get run by the 0-day > build testing service, which checks lots of trees. Perhaps both are > useful, since Joe had some conerns about the amount of relevant context > available in a patch. Yup, both could certainly be useful. A coccinelle script would likely be able to catch a few false negatives that might pass through the checkpatch script. It'll likely have similar difficulties with KERN_CONTs though. Also, I don't really know, but it might be tough enabling a script to run on 0-day with the ~6000 potential errors already existing. Logan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
