On 25/11/17 10:51 PM, Julia Lawall wrote: > I don't understand at all the second sentence. Are you staying with the > same call, or moving on to other calls? Also, it would be the call that > is split over multiple lines, not the function split over multiple lines. Yes, you are correct it should be "call" instead of "function". > I think this would have been much easier with Cocccinelle where the code > is parsed and the control-flow graph is available to see whether there is > a pr_cont afterwards. But if it works, then it is surely good enough. I don't disagree at all. However, to my knowledge, not a lot of kernel developers run a set of coccinelle scripts on their change sets. The point is to catch these mistakes before the patch is submitted. Logan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
