> If you play the "smaller executable object code" card, people expect that
> you provide the actual numbers, too.
I can offer another bit of information for this software development discussion.
The affected source file can be compiled for the processor architecture “x86_64”
by a tool like “GCC 6.4.1+r251631-1.3” from the software distribution
“openSUSE Tumbleweed” with the following command example.
my_cc=/usr/bin/gcc-6 \
&& my_module=drivers/net/usb/sr9800.ko \
&& git checkout next-20171009 \
&& make -j4 CC="${my_cc}" HOSTCC="${my_cc}" allmodconfig "${my_module}" \
&& size "${my_module}" \
&& git checkout ':/^sr9800: Use common error handling code in sr9800_phy_powerup' \
&& make -j4 CC="${my_cc}" HOSTCC="${my_cc}" allmodconfig "${my_module}" \
&& size "${my_module}"
Do you find the following details useful for further clarification?
text: -47
data: 0
bss: 0
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
