On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 02:04:36PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 03:59:14PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The 0x in front of a base 10 number is misleading so I removed it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> > index 89993c4be1be..a5382e90418c 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static void data_abort_decode(unsigned int esr)
> > (esr & ESR_ELx_SF) >> ESR_ELx_SF_SHIFT,
> > (esr & ESR_ELx_AR) >> ESR_ELx_AR_SHIFT);
> > } else {
> > - pr_alert(" ISV = 0, ISS = 0x%08lu\n", esr & ESR_ELx_ISS_MASK);
> > + pr_alert(" ISV = 0, ISS = %08lu\n", esr & ESR_ELx_ISS_MASK);
>
> A fix has already been queued [0,1], ensuring this is printed as hex.
>
> Catalin, I see that hasn't been pushed out to the arm64 fixes/core
> branch. Is that deliberate?
No. Only that my tests took about a day to complete. I'll push the
patches out today.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
