Hi,
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 03:59:14PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The 0x in front of a base 10 number is misleading so I removed it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index 89993c4be1be..a5382e90418c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static void data_abort_decode(unsigned int esr)
> (esr & ESR_ELx_SF) >> ESR_ELx_SF_SHIFT,
> (esr & ESR_ELx_AR) >> ESR_ELx_AR_SHIFT);
> } else {
> - pr_alert(" ISV = 0, ISS = 0x%08lu\n", esr & ESR_ELx_ISS_MASK);
> + pr_alert(" ISV = 0, ISS = %08lu\n", esr & ESR_ELx_ISS_MASK);
A fix has already been queued [0,1], ensuring this is printed as hex.
Catalin, I see that hasn't been pushed out to the arm64 fixes/core
branch. Is that deliberate?
Thanks,
Mark.
[0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1506944520-21998-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@xxxxxxx
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171002140632.alqo4u5dn5uenjt7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
