>> Will the software evolution be continued for related source files? >> Are there any update candidates left over in the directory “v4l2-core”? > > Sorry, I don't understand the question. I try to explain my view again. > We don't want to touch the videobuf-* files unless there is a very good reason. I hoped that my update suggestions could be good enough once more for this area. > That old videobuf framework is deprecated and the code is quite fragile > (i.e. easy to break things). How do you think about to move this stuff into a separate subdirectory so that it might become a bit easier to distinguish these software components? > Everything else in that directory is under continuous development. I am curious if there are still update candidates left over (also from my selection of change possibilities). Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
