Hi,
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 02:16:19PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The comparisons for integer low on low > INT_MAX and also
> integer high > INT_MAX are never going to be true since an
> int type cannot be greater than INT_MAX. Remove these redundant
> checks.
>
> Detected by: CoverityScan CID#1455245, 1455248 ("Operands don't affect
> result (CONSTANT_EXPRESSION_RESULT)")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/broadcom/brcmstb_thermal.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/brcmstb_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/brcmstb_thermal.c
> index 87b8e7a86ee3..bcb3945feea6 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/brcmstb_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/brcmstb_thermal.c
> @@ -278,8 +278,6 @@ static int brcmstb_set_trips(void *data, int low, int high)
> dev_dbg(priv->dev, "set trips %d <--> %d\n", low, high);
>
> if (low) {
> - if (low > INT_MAX)
> - low = INT_MAX;
> avs_tmon_set_trip_temp(priv, TMON_TRIP_TYPE_LOW, low);
> avs_tmon_trip_enable(priv, TMON_TRIP_TYPE_LOW, 1);
> } else {
> @@ -287,8 +285,6 @@ static int brcmstb_set_trips(void *data, int low, int high)
> }
>
> if (high < ULONG_MAX) {
Dan's robots noticed that the above condition is not useful either (on
architectures where INT_MAX < ULONG_MAX -- i.e., all?), since 'high' is
'int', not 'unsigned long'.
Should probably fix that
s/ULONG_MAX/INT_MAX/
?
Brian
> - if (high > INT_MAX)
> - high = INT_MAX;
> avs_tmon_set_trip_temp(priv, TMON_TRIP_TYPE_HIGH, high);
> avs_tmon_trip_enable(priv, TMON_TRIP_TYPE_HIGH, 1);
> } else {
> --
> 2.14.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
