On 13/06/17 20:24, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:56 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:03:21 +0100 >> >>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> The guid hns_dsaf_acpi_dsm_guid does not need to be in global >>> scope, so make it static. >>> >>> Cleans up sparse warning: >>> "symbol 'hns_dsaf_acpi_dsm_guid' was not declared. Should it be static?" >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> That symbol doesn't even exist in th net-next tree. > > It looks like the patch is done against UUID tree. > Cc'ed Christoph. > Sorry, I messed up on determining the original tree it came from in linux-next when I looked at the output from get_maintainer.pl Colin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
