We recently introduced a kfree() in the caller for this function.
That's where, logically, you would think the kfree() should be.
Unfortunately the code was just ugly and not buggy so the static
checker warning was a false postive and introduced a double free.
I've removed the old kfree() and left the new one.
Fixes: 021e2927586d ("scsi: dpt_i2o: Add a missing call to kfree")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c b/drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c
index f88b3d2..27c0dce 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c
@@ -651,7 +651,6 @@ static u32 adpt_ioctl_to_context(adpt_hba * pHba, void *reply)
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(pHba->host->host_lock, flags);
if (i >= nr) {
- kfree (reply);
printk(KERN_WARNING"%s: Too many outstanding "
"ioctl commands\n", pHba->name);
return (u32)-1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
