[PATCH 52/54] md/raid10: Replace a seq_printf() call by seq_puts() in raid10_status()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 21:41:09 +0200

The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.

WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/md/raid10.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index 82d79f5..554b6d2 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -1502,7 +1502,7 @@ static void raid10_status(struct seq_file *seq, struct mddev *mddev)
 		seq_printf(seq, "%s", rdev && test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) ? "U" : "_");
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-	seq_printf(seq, "]");
+	seq_puts(seq, "]");
 }
 
 /* check if there are enough drives for
-- 
2.10.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux