Re: MD-RAID: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: MD-RAID: Fine-tuning for several function implementations
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 10:49:49 +0200
Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>, Mike Christie <mchristi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>, Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tomasz Majchrzak <tomasz.majchrzak@xxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <786843ef-4b6f-eb04-7326-2f6f5b408826@users.sourceforge.net>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

Please stop it NOW.  This is not fine tuning but a waste of everyones
time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MD-RAID: Fine-tuning for several function implementations
  - From: SF Markus Elfring

References:
- Source code review around jump label usage
  - From: SF Markus Elfring
- MD-RAID: Fine-tuning for several function implementations
  - From: SF Markus Elfring

Prev by Date: [PATCH 26/54] md/raid5: Improve another size determination in setup_conf()
Next by Date: [PATCH 27/54] md/raid5: Return directly after a failed kzalloc() in setup_conf()
Previous by thread: [PATCH 26/54] md/raid5: Improve another size determination in setup_conf()
Next by thread: Re: MD-RAID: Fine-tuning for several function implementations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Announce] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Networking Development] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Device Mapper]