>> The script "checkpatch.pl" can point out that assignments should usually >> not be performed within condition checks. >> Thus move the assignment for a variable to a separate statement >> in four functions. > > Did you recycle this commit explanation? Yes. - I am going to use similar commit messages for further changes in other software modules. > Because git diff tells me you actually touched about eight functions. You are right. - I'm sorry that I overlooked to update this number somehow. > scripts/checkpatch.pl -f drivers/isdn/capi/capidrv.c | grep "assignment in if condition" | wc -l > > It tells me there are actually 18 instances of this "ERROR". > Why did you ignore one of it in this patch? Did I accidentally leave another update candidate over? * How do you think about to pick such a software update opportunity up? * Do you expect a resend for the steps 3 - 5 of this small patch series? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
